DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

April 15, 2011

The Honorable Gary Locke

Secretary of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20230

 

Dear Secretary Locke:

 

As the leaders of America’s leading research universities, we are grateful for the commitment demonstrated by this administration to the research conducted by our students and faculty. At a time of significant budgetary challenges, we appreciate this administration’s recognition of the continued need to invest in research and education through its support of strong budgets for the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, the Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Department of Defense Research and Engineering Organizations, and other such agencies.

 

Fueled by federal funding and encouraged by enlightened federal policies such as the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, America’s colleges and universities spur economic growth and prepare the next generation of scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs. Breakthroughs from university-based research have led to entirely new industries in sectors such as information technology, biotechnology, clean energy, and nanotechnology. Universities participate in regional innovation clusters, partner with existing companies to commercialize federally-funded research, nurture startups, attract and motivate commercialization talent, and educate and train a world-class workforce.

 

Already engaged in many activities that promote innovation, entrepreneurship, and the commercialization of research results, we are committed to working even more closely with industry, private foundations, venture capitalists and local, state and federal governments to enhance our efforts. These organizations, too, have significant roles to play in improving the technology commercialization processes, encouraging entrepreneurship, and instituting policies and programs that support regional economic development.

 

In pursuit of these shared goals, many of our universities are actively building campus-wide innovation ecosystems and expanding them into regional and national networks. But as we move forward, we also will employ new strategies, enhance existing activities, and expand our efforts in several areas.

 

2

Promoting Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Many campuses already offer courses aimed at teaching entrepreneurship, provide new opportunities for experiential learning, run student business plan competitions, support student clubs, and sponsor programs that put multidisciplinary student teams to work solving real world challenges. To promote student innovation and entrepreneurship further, we will:

 

·         Build upon and expand these activities.

·         Create new programs and grow existing activities on our campuses to encourage undergraduates, graduate students, and post-doctoral students to pursue careers as innovators and entrepreneurs.

·         Develop new cross-college, cross-disciplinary programs that connect business with science, math, technology and engineering fields.

·         Extend these programs to reach young people in underserved and low-income areas by involving community colleges in consortia for training and mentoring in innovation and entrepreneurial activities.

 

Encouraging faculty innovation and entrepreneurship

Financial incentives, faculty industry sabbatical leaves, campus prizes and other forms of recognition encourage faculty innovation and entrepreneurship. To promote these ideals further, we will:

 

·         Expand efforts to encourage, recognize and reward faculty interest in research commercialization by providing incentives and encouraging engagements with industry, entrepreneurs and venture partners.

·         Create or expand programs that connect faculty and students to the resources they need: industry partners, entrepreneurial mentors, translational research and “proof-of-concept” funds, accelerator facilities and venture creation services.

·         Encourage streamlining and reduction in reporting and compliance requirements, which would allow faculty to increase time spent on proposal writing and research.

·         We also call upon the federal government to refrain from enacting policies, such as overly stringent regulations on conflict of interest, that discourage our faculty from working with industry or developing innovative technologies.

 

Actively supporting the university technology transfer function

Moving an idea effectively across the “valley of death” requires critical programs that include funding for proof of concept research and new mechanisms within the existing grant process that help defray the costs and risks. To actively support the university technology transfer function we will:

 

·         Work to further reduce barriers to technology transfer to accelerate the rate at which ideas move from the lab to the marketplace. Central to this effort will be to ensure that our technology transfer offices are adequately staffed with skilled professionals who are provided with the resources to effectively and efficiently perform their jobs.

·         Publicly promote the importance of technology transfer, to encourage participation by our researchers and encourage engagements with potential partners.

·         Establish policies to encourage technology transfer offices to strive to maximize the societal and economic development benefits of discoveries, rather than maximizing revenues.

 

We also encourage government and state governments, and business collaborators to

·         Expand networking conferences and events to exchange best practices and attract talent and resources for commercialization activities.

·         Assist in these efforts by subsidizing the costs of research commercialization.

·         Create a new SBIR program that could focus on commercialization with Phase 0 awards to be used by universities to engage in prototyping, funding mentoring talent and supporting market-readiness initiatives.

·         Establish federal tax credits that could be provided to industry to encourage businesses and venture partners to leverage university technologies and start-up venture opportunities.

 

Facilitating University-Industry Collaboration

To increase the presence of industries on campus, many of our institutions have established a "front door" or portals to enhance access to research expertise, intellectual property, and commercial opportunities. To facilitate university-industry collaboration, we will:

·         Further support programs that facilitate sharing of labs, facilities, student-faculty teams, and other resources.

·         Strengthen strategic investments in university-industry collaborations aimed at advancing technologies of mutual interest and renowned research programs, designed to enhance market-pull of research.

·         Develop ways to incentivize and support industry R&D professionals to collaborate with universities.

·         Encourage the development of accelerators and public-private partnerships on or within close proximity to campuses; and find ways to provide innovation services to new enterprises external to the university.

 

We also call on federal agencies to assist by:

 

·         Building entrepreneurship and innovation components into agency grants;

·         Creating opportunities within federal agencies for high-risk innovative research;

·         Allowing, as appropriate, commercial potential to be a part of grant proposals through the development of commercialization plans;

·         Including the evaluation of market potential of new technologies as a milestone component in research;

·         Facilitating the presence of industry on campus by creating an IRS exemption for university-industry collaborations built around university-owned intellectual property and conducted in university buildings;

·         Promoting a DARPA-hybrid model of collaboration between small firms and universities; and  Funding talent collaborations, especially for universities with less-developed innovation ecosystems.

 

Engaging with regional and local economic development efforts

Our universities will promote efforts to link regional and national stakeholders together in support of research and education critical to local businesses and industry by:

 

·         Striving to expand existing university participation in national, regional and local economic development efforts.

·         Fostering consortia of research universities and industries across regions.

·         Working with the federal government and other stakeholders and professional associations to improve the coordination of the nation’s venture accelerators, including development of a searchable database of all federally funded intellectual property.

·         Working with local, regional, state and business leaders to promote access to assets such as research parks, accelerators, and laboratories to support regional industries, especially existing and small, young companies.

·         Participating in developing and implementing economic strategies

·         Partnering in community development and revitalization efforts.

 

Recognizing exemplary economic engagement

To accelerate achievement of the goals outlined in this letter, we call on the National Advisory Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship and the Obama Administration to work with the higher education community to develop a national program to identify, recognize and celebrate exemplars of “economically engaged” universities. This program would:

 

·          Raise awareness about the importance of higher education and economic engagement in driving regional and national economic growth

·          Assist with the creation of organizational assessment tools and measurement criteria that capture the full range of our impact

·          Educate higher education leaders about the practices of best-in-class institutions

·          Recognize national role models and honor them with a Presidential Award for economic engagement.

 

Our universities, and the national associations that represent us, are committed to sharing best practices, and to identifying additional federal policies that will help to leverage investments made by government, and industry, in the research conducted at our institutions. Further, we will continue to use national forums, such the Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), the University Industry Demonstration Partnership (UIDP) and the Commerce Department’s National Advisory Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, to engage in an ongoing dialogue with industry, non-profit foundations and the government on how we can advance our shared objectives.

 

We are also seeking ways to collectively implement recommendations made by the National Research Council in its October 2010 report, Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest.

 

Although the specifics of our strategies will vary, reflecting the diverse missions and resources of our institutions, we pledge our universities to greater efforts to advance regional and national economic growth. We are dedicated to ensuring that the knowledge and technological breakthroughs developed at our institutions are rapidly and broadly disseminated to advance the nation’s social and economic interests.

Sincerely,

Mary Sue Coleman, Chair;  President of the University of Michigan

Michael Crow, President of Arizona State University

G.P. Bud Peterson, President of Georgia Institute of Technology

Holden Thorp, President of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

and further endorsed by over 135 other Presidents